Description
PDF document contains 27 aphasia identification wallet cards
$9.99
This resource includes 27 aphasia identification wallet cards. Print, personalize, and provide these cards to your clients with aphasia to support daily communication exchanges.
PDF document contains 27 aphasia identification wallet cards
You must be logged in to post a review.
This memory bundle includes a memory book template, interventions, compensatory strategies, and therapeutic activities that target goals of memory, attention, and orientation skills. It also includes educational handouts and printable safety signs.
The Functional Speech Therapy Workbook contains five sections and includes 340+ pages of functional activities that can be used to target real world cognitive-linguistic skills. Over the last decade, Person-centered care (PCC) has become the new standard across healthcare settings. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are “expected to provide PCC as part of their therapeutic interactions” (DiLollo & Favreau, 2010). Based on a person-centered care model, SLPs should select functional goals, plan functional treatment activities, and report functional gains (Elman & Bernstein-Ellis, 1995). But what does ‘functional’ therapy really mean? It is important that the patient and his or her family is involved in the treatment plan, especially when setting individualized short- and long- term goals. Ultimately, the goal of treatment should aim to maximize independence and improve quality of life. Unlike a typical workbook, this resource is packed with practical and relevant treatment materials that support this model and promote generalization into activities of daily living.
What is Phonological Components Analysis?
Developed and modeled after Semantic Feature Analysis (SFA), Phonological Components Analysis (PCA) is an evidence-based technique that aims to improve awareness of phonological properties of words and support word retrieval in PWA. First introduced by Leonard et al. (2008), PCA showed positive outcomes in 7 out of the 10 individuals studied and some generalization for untrained words. Van Hees et al. (2013) further investigated PCA by comparing it to SFA. In this study, 7 out of 8 people showed improvements for treated words with PCA and only 4 people showed improvements with SFA (Van Hees et al., 2013). Van Hees et al., 2013 suggests that individuals with semantic difficulties will likely have more success with PCA and it is expected that individuals with phonological deficits will show improvements with both treatment techniques.
Leonard, C., Rochon, E., & Laird, L. (2008). Treating naming impairments in aphasia: Findings from a phonological components analysis treatment. Aphasiology, 22(9), 923-947.
Van Hees, S., Angwin, A., McMahon, K., & Copland, D. (2013). A comparison of semantic feature analysis and phonological components analysis for the treatment of naming impairments in aphasia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 23(1), 102-132.
This PDF includes:
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
Krystina Sanchez (verified owner) –
Very good cards. Practical.